<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>saveeumundi.org &#187; SCRC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saveeumundi.org/tag/scrc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saveeumundi.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Submission on SCRC Energy Transition Plan.</title>
		<link>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2010/11/submission-on-scrc-energy-transition-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2010/11/submission-on-scrc-energy-transition-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Save Eumundi Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCRC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saveeumundi.org/?p=1522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of the Sunshine Coast Regional Council&#8217;s &#8216;our place, our future&#8217; community engagement program, the following was submitted regarding the  Draft Sunshine Coast Energy Transition Plan 2010-2020, by Graham Smith, PAGE Committee Member, Nov 2010:
Comments on the Energy Transition Plan
General:
Council is to be congratulated on this forward thinking approach to the issues of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>As part of the Sunshine Coast Regional Council&#8217;s &#8216;our place, our future&#8217; community engagement program,</em><em> the following was submitted regarding the  Draft Sunshine Coast Energy Transition Plan 2010-2020, by Graham Smith, PAGE Committee Member, Nov 2010:</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Comments on the Energy Transition Plan</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>General:</strong></p>
<p>Council is to be congratulated on this forward thinking approach to the issues of peak oil and the climate change impacts from stationary energy consumption. The initiatives outlines are worthwhile starts to meet the vision of sustainability for the region; however on their own they will not deliver the most sustainable region in Australia. This will require much bolder and more significant action than the Council envisages or is willing to commit to based upon the previous 2 1/2years and the plan as outlined.  The major contributor to Greenhouse gases is stationary energy. Stationary energy on the Sunshine  Coast is predominantly sourced from coal fired power. There is little within the plan to create significant embedded generation, delivering investment, jobs and clean energy to the region.</p>
<p>It can only be hoped that this is a start. Bold steps were expected from the Council (such as the Woking example in the UK).</p>
<p><strong>Specific comments:</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top"><strong>Page Number</strong></td>
<td width="480" valign="top"><strong>Comment</strong></td>
<td width="492" valign="top"><strong>Issue</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top">23 / para 2</td>
<td width="480" valign="top">The paragraph mixes housing growth for   the whole of the Sunshine Coast with energy growth for the Northern Sunshine    Coast only. To present   clear information both regions should be highlighted and illustrated as there   is a significant difference in growth profiles for the Northern Sunshine   Coast  and the Southern area (as defined by Energex).</td>
<td width="492" valign="top">Please provide the detailed information   on forecast construction rates and energy growth for both energy regions and   in total to provide a balanced and complete picture.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top">23 / para 2</td>
<td width="480" valign="top">Stating that the growth in construction   has a direct impact on energy growth is reasonable. Assuming that it will   continue to grow in the future, as it has in the past assumes that future   housing construction will be as energy intensive and inefficient as is   currently the case.</td>
<td width="492" valign="top">Please provide specific details in the   energy transition plan for the future regulation / planning requirements   specifying the minimum energy rating for all future housing. It would be   clearly counterproductive to continue to permit the building of energy   intensive and inefficient housing exacerbating future problems within the   plan.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top">37/4.3.3</td>
<td width="480" valign="top"><strong>Stationary Energy Conservation Targets </strong></td>
<td width="492" valign="top">These targets appear to be very conservative   – 3,000 within 4 years and 10,000 within 9 years. Please state what   considerations have been considered in arriving at these very low targets and   what % of the households across the Council region do they represent to   provide some context for the size of the targets.</p>
<p>Stretch goals are more powerful than   goals which are too conservatively set. Aim high and you have our permission   to fail to fully meet them. Aim low and you have failed before you have   started.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top">37/4.3.3</td>
<td width="480" valign="top"><strong>Stationary Energy Demand Management</strong></td>
<td width="492" valign="top">Please put this into context as a % of   peak load demand for the region, so that the community has some means of   assessing the scale of the program being proposed and across which energy   regions it is being proposed.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top">37/4.3.3</td>
<td width="480" valign="top"><strong>Stationary Energy Generation</strong></td>
<td width="492" valign="top">Please split the generation proposed by   energy region. The split is important given the perceived demand for peak   energy in the Northern region is driving the Powerlink transmission line   proposal. How much of the generation is expected to mitigate peak demand.   This is key – under the Australian Energy Regulator rules it is possible to   obtain the funding approved for network augmentation for alternative projects   if it can be demonstrated that the augmentation can be deferred or the need   eliminated. I remind Council that it is Council policy to work towards   eliminating the need for the Powerlink project. Providing cleaner sources of   energy that remove the need for this project also removes the significant   additional import of carbon intensive energy into the region and   substantially boosting the Council’s ability to meet its’ sustainability   vision.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top">N/A</td>
<td width="480" valign="top"><strong>Street lighting options paper</strong></td>
<td width="492" valign="top">Reference to a street lighting options   paper energy initiatives associated with the Council’s extensive network of   street lighting and the significant opportunities (cost savings for Council   and rate payers), reduced peak demand and carbon emissions. I would draw the   Council’s attention to previous work undertaken by the Maroochy Council   who  undertook a review of the cost and efficiency of street lighting   finding that a new generation of street lights were significantly energy   efficient, lasted for many times the life of the existing lights and   consequently required less maintenance – savings all round. Please comment on   the status of the Maroochy Council initiative and why it appears that we are   back to an options paper again instead of investigating implementation   planning.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top">42</td>
<td width="480" valign="top"><strong>Council’s   Expression of Interest for Energy Conservation</strong></p>
<p><strong>and Generation</strong></td>
<td width="492" valign="top">PAGE requested this EOI be conducted and   expedited given the urgency of delivering viable alternatives to the   Powerlink proposal and in meeting the Council’s own resolution opposing the   Powerlink proposal. It is now 16 ½ months since that meeting in June 2009.   PAGE and the community are still waiting to see the results of this process   and a published</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83" valign="top">43 / 4</td>
<td width="480" valign="top"><strong>A natural   gas pipeline feeding a gas fired power station</strong></td>
<td width="492" valign="top">As Council are aware, there is already an   existing easement for a gas pipeline running through the heart of the Sunshine Coast. As has been the experience   overseas (see Woking Council, UK and their success in more than halving their   carbon emissions), please expand the assessment from a single gas fired power   station to multiple embedded small scale gas Combined Heat &amp; Power   generators based on gas, efficient usage of waste heat in the generation   process and abundant solar power make for a compelling generation case.</p>
<p>The architect of the Woking solution,   Alan Jones is currently working for Sydney   and is an expert on delivering embedded generation. I suggest getting him   upto the Sunshine    Coast to hear first   hand what can be done with imagination, drive and at little or no cost to the   Council.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2010/11/submission-on-scrc-energy-transition-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Hope For Residents in Battle To Stop Powerlines</title>
		<link>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/12/new-hope-for-residents-in-battle-to-stop-powerlines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/12/new-hope-for-residents-in-battle-to-stop-powerlines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Save Eumundi Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viable Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCRC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saveeumundi.org/?p=1316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Coast council has given people power a boost with it&#8217;s call this week for expressions of interest for alternatives to the State Government&#8217;s controversial Eerwah Vale power lines plan.
Read the article below by Isobel Coleman that appeared in the Noosa Journal on 31 December 2009.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Coast council has given people power a boost with it&#8217;s call this week for expressions of interest for alternatives to the State Government&#8217;s controversial Eerwah Vale power lines plan.</p>
<p>Read the article below by Isobel Coleman that appeared in the Noosa Journal on 31 December 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.saveeumundi.org/wp-content/themes/mimbo2.2/images/2010/01/mike-and-anna-bligh-20091231.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1317" title="mike-and-anna-bligh-20091231" src="http://www.saveeumundi.org/wp-content/themes/mimbo2.2/images/2010/01/mike-and-anna-bligh-20091231-300x269.jpg" alt="mike-and-anna-bligh-20091231" width="300" height="269" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/12/new-hope-for-residents-in-battle-to-stop-powerlines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council moved to fight biggest challenge to sustainability vision</title>
		<link>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/06/council-moved-to-fight-biggest-challenge-to-sustainability-vision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/06/council-moved-to-fight-biggest-challenge-to-sustainability-vision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Save Eumundi Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PAGE media releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viable Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivien Griffen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saveeumundi.org/?p=1118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local residents yesterday (22 June) had the undivided attention and support of local councillors, when they shone the spotlight on the single biggest challenge facing Sunshine Coast Regional Council’s new vision to become Australia’s most sustainable region.
Invited to present at council’s General Meeting, members of the Powerlines Action Group of Eumundi (PAGE) told councillors of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Local residents yesterday (22 June) had the undivided attention and support of local councillors, when they shone the spotlight on the single biggest challenge facing Sunshine Coast Regional Council’s new vision to become Australia’s most sustainable region.</p>
<p>Invited to present at council’s General Meeting, members of the Powerlines Action Group of Eumundi (PAGE) told councillors of the devastating impacts of high voltage powerlines planned for the region on, among other things, council’s vibrant, green and sustainable ambitions.</p>
<p>“Meeting future demand for power on the Sunshine Coast in a sustainable way is possibly the biggest issue for our community, our council and our time,” said PAGE coordinator Graham Smith.</p>
<p>“A Powerlink proposal locking the coast in to 20-plus years of dirty, coal-fired energy in an effort to meet peak demand, which only occurs about three to four days each year, is outrageous and will contradict any strategy our council rolls out to achieve a sustainable, low carbon economy.</p>
<p>“Yesterday, we therefore called on council to pass a resolution opposing the proposal in defence of our shared visions for cleaner, greener 21st century solutions to meeting our energy needs.</p>
<p>“In response, council rose to the challenge and unanimously agreed to move a resolution opposing the Powerlink proposal, which is scheduled to be ratified at council’s Ordinary Meeting on Thursday.</p>
<p>“We were also impressed that now was the time for council to embrace new technologies and issue an Expression of Interest (EOI) to engage industry specialising in demand management, energy efficiency and local generation with a view to ‘eliminating the need for Powerlink infrastructure’.</p>
<p>“And again, PAGE members were pleased that council agreed and vowed to issue an EOI with the aim of developing solutions contributing to the elimination of the need for the Powerlink project.”</p>
<p>Attending the meeting was Mayor Bob Abbot and Councillors Vivien Griffin, Jenny McKay, Keryn Jones, Lew Brennan, Tim Dwyer, Anna Grosskreutz, Chris Thompson, Ted Hungerford and Russell Green, plus a 30-strong public gallery.</p>
<p>The residents group was also buoyed by a <a href="http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/06/bligh-unveils-renewable-energy-plan-for-queensland/">Queensland Government announcement yesterday</a> regarding its Renewable Energy Plan requiring all state-owned energy companies to “… submit a renewable energy network benefit statement detailing where deployment of renewable energy or demand management projects could help avoid building or upgrading electricity networks”.</p>
<p>“We’re now looking forward to Powerlink reviewing the renewable energy network benefit statement relating to this project and the real benefits arising out of this plan,” Mr Smith said.</p>
<p>PAGE, also known as People Advocating Green Energy, is a volunteer group which formed 20 months ago in reply to Powerlink’s proposed 275kV, 70km Woolooga to Cooroy South (Eerwah Vale) Transmission Line and Substation Project, estimated to cost energy consumers $130 million and involve around 440 hectares of hinterland and rural land.</p>
<p>The project also plans to carve a new 8.5km, 60m-wide easement through private property, including 14 dedicated Land for Wildlife properties and precious koala, Richmond Birdwing Butterfly and other vulnerable species’ habitat, from Ridgewood to Eerwah Vale.</p>
<p>PAGE led the development of a viable non-network alternative to the destructive project, which includes significant ‘bankable’ demand management initiatives and scalable, local renewable solar-thermal generation with storage capacity, plus real employment opportunities for locals through the creation of green jobs.</p>
<p>Mr Smith said PAGE members were grateful for the opportunity to present alternatives to council.</p>
<p>“We are a group committed to promoting sustainable ways to meet the Sunshine Coast’s future energy needs, and to working constructively with governments to do so,” he said.</p>
<p>“Council has taken a decisive step towards realising its visions for a green and sustainable Sunshine Coast, and we’re delighted to not only share these ambitions but to also to contribute to finding a solution.”</p>
<p>Other discussion items and outcomes included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Powerlink’s proposal would deliver capacity to increase energy consumption by at least 7.5 times current consumption, over-engineering the solution and likely to cause stranded assets</li>
<li>Proposal would also see an estimated rise of 59% GHG emissions (400,000t CO2-e by 2020) and at least 20 hectares of vegetation cleared in Noosa Biosphere</li>
<li>Council agreed to continue consulting with Powerlink on their project, especially regarding the project need, population and energy growth projections, and also ensured a strong community voice on this issue by inviting and agreeing to consult with PAGE through council’s Energy Transition Project</li>
<li>Council agreed to schedule meetings with the relevant Ministers to address the shared concerns over this project</li>
<li>A clean energy solar-thermal alternative</li>
<li>Lower impact alternative routes</li>
<li>Energex’ statements: “…spending on poles and wires is unsustainable. Energy efficiency and demand management are the key”.</li>
</ul>
<p>For information regarding PAGE’s presentation, email contact@saveeumundi.org and for more information on PAGE and the project visit www.saveemundi.org</p>
<p>The resolution unanimously adopted at the general committee of council is attached for your information.</p>
<h2>Extract from council minutes of general meeting 22 June 2009.</h2>
<h3>COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION</h3>
<p><strong>Moved: </strong>Councillor V Griffin<br />
<strong>Seconded:</strong> Councillor L Brennan<br />
<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>That Council:</strong></p>
<p>(a) endorses the Council officers&#8217; submission (Appendix A &#8211; Submission on Woolooga to Cooroy Transmission Line and Cooroy South Substation Project<br />
Environmental Impact Statement);</p>
<p>(b) continues to engage with Powerlink and Powerlines Action Group Eumundi (PAGE), through the energy transition working group as this project progresses;</p>
<p>(c) request a follow-up submission providing further information on population projections and Council&#8217;s Corporate plan objectives for reducing the region&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions and advising that Council opposes Powerlink infrastructure proposal on the grounds that there are more sustainable initiatives in meeting the regions energy needs in the future;</p>
<p>(d) proceed with the calling for Expressions of Interest (EOI) from entities who may be able to contribute to eliminating the need for Powerlink infrastructure through the generation of power closer to the projected energy user locations in accordance with s489 of the Local Government Act 1993 and notes that the calling of the EOI will be in the public interest for the following reason:</p>
<ul>
<li>it will allow for a full review of future energy production options for Council to consider which are consistent with Council’s goal to be the most sustainable region in Australia;</li>
</ul>
<p>(e) request the Minister for Energy to undertake a full cost benefit analysis of the Powerlink project, comparing the cost of the proposed distribution infrastructure, together with costs of power generation against the cost of sourcing renewable energy generated closer to user locations and potentially obviating the requirement for the proposed distribution infrastructure; and</p>
<p>(f) request the Chief Executive Officer to investigate the Federal and State demand reduction and renewable energy generation grants and incentives, and assess Council’s eligibility to apply.</p>
<p>Carried.</p>
<p>Ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/06/council-moved-to-fight-biggest-challenge-to-sustainability-vision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sustainability task a big one</title>
		<link>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/01/sustainability-task-a-big-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/01/sustainability-task-a-big-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Save Eumundi Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivien Griffen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saveeumundi.org/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sunshine Coast Regional Council - Division nine councillor Vivien Griffin.
COMMENT: Vivien Griffin
As a council, we have set ourselves the goal of being the most sustainable region in Australia. If we are to be serious about this goal, 2009 must be the year we commence that journey in partnership with our communities.
I am confident this council [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_354" class="wp-caption left" style="width: 204px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-354" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="v-griffen" src="http://www.saveeumundi.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/v-griffen.jpg" alt="Sunshine Coast Regional Council - Division nine councillor Vivien Griffin." width="194" height="194" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sunshine Coast Regional Council - Division nine councillor Vivien Griffin.</p></div>
<p>COMMENT: Vivien Griffin</p>
<p>As a council, we have set ourselves the goal of being the most sustainable region in Australia. If we are to be serious about this goal, 2009 must be the year we commence that journey in partnership with our communities.</p>
<p>I am confident this council and its residents have the intellect and determination to succeed. Nevertheless, I have recently had confirmed to me the magnitude and seriousness of the task, through being referred to the November 2008 World Energy Outlook prepared by the International Energy Agency (www.iea.org/ Textbase/npsum/WEO2008 SUM.pdf).</p>
<p>The opening paragraph of the executive summary of this report reads:</p>
<p>&#8220;The world’s energy system is at a crossroads. Current global trends in energy supply and consumption are patently unsustainable – environmentally, economically, socially. But that can – and must – be altered; there’s still time to change the road we’re on.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is not an exaggeration to claim that the future of human prosperity depends on how successfully we tackle the two central energy challenges facing us today:</p>
<ul>
<li>Securing the supply of reliable and affordable energy; and</li>
<li>Effecting a rapid transformation to a low-carbon, efficient and environmentally benign system of energy supply.</li>
</ul>
<p>What is needed is nothing short of an energy revolution. This World Energy Outlook demonstrates how that might be achieved through decisive policy action and at what cost. It also describes the consequences of failure.”</p>
<p>Perhaps if these were the words of some fringe, doom and gloom group, we could ignore them. However, the International Energy Agency reports to 27 countries about energy matters.</p>
<p>It is regarded as one of two pre-eminent energy agencies in the world, the other being the US government’s Energy Information Agency. It has traditionally always projected that oil supply will meet oil demand.</p>
<p>However, after a major review of its data, it now paints a serious picture of the action all levels of government must take on the twin challenges of climate change and peak oil if we are to position our communities for resilience in the future.</p>
<p>Our council must be ready to tackle the big issues, and the key ones are climate change and peak oil.</p>
<p>Councillors Chris Thompson and Tim Dwyer became fathers last year. Their children will be 21 in 2030. I think it will be useful for us as a council to always ask ‘what kind of world are we preparing for these future adults?’.</p>
<p>I chair council’s Community Transport Group, which meets for the first time on January 22.</p>
<p>It is a terrific group with great skills and energy to contribute to the goal of sustainable transport on the Sunshine Coast.</p>
<p>I suspect they already know, but what I want to convey to them is a sense of the magnitude and necessity of their task.</p>
<p>For them to understand that changing the transport culture of this region in time to deliver the “energy revolution” required by the International Energy Agency requires a war footing, and for them to think of themselves as a War Cabinet.</p>
<p>Sound dramatic? Sure does and sure is. I am looking forward to it!</p>
<p><strong>Source:  http://www.thedaily.com.au/news/2009/jan/16/sustainability-task-big-one/</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saveeumundi.org/2009/01/sustainability-task-a-big-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

